Introduction:
Ikkousha’s (the two-time Ramen Champion which
constantly sold twice the amount of ramen bowls its closest competitor sold,
and would have conceivably won the competition until 2050) recent departure
meant that a stall had been vacated. Tonkotsu Itto is the newcomer with
the privilege of inheriting Ikkousha’s corner location, along with assuming its
heavy mantle. This (judging it using its predecessor’s excellence as a benchmark) isn’t
necessarily fair for Tonkotsu Itto, but eating great ramen from the corner
stall is what customers have unsurprisingly grown accustomed to.
Quality
What
I had: Tonkotsu Ramen with Egg ($13.50)
Upon receiving my bowl of ramen, I took a
deep breath and immediately liked the heavy pork smell wafting from it –a harbinger
of a thick, flavoursome broth. Never mind the shallow, concave bowl with its paltrier
than usual serving size, I thought, it wouldn’t matter if the broth was as good
as I hoped it’d be.
You can't tell how small it is from here |
Although calling the noodles beehoon-thin
would have been an exaggeration (albeit not a major one), I was tempted to
label it as such. Its near strawlike width provided the broth with too little
surface area to cling to, causing the unsurprising end result to be noodles
that didn’t retain the broth’s taste. In addition, I felt that the noodles had
too little bite to them and were slightly overcooked.
Just look at how ridiculously thin it is! |
The chashu was paper-thin. Yes, I resisted
the urge to exaggerate about the noodles’ thinness earlier on, but I promise that
wasn’t an excuse to postpone the exaggeration to apply to the chashu. It really
was paper-thin, almost as thin as a piece of vanguard paper. Perhaps the chef
was well-intentioned in doing this, by intending for it to have that
melt-in-your-mouth quality, in which case he achieved his aim. Still, providing
just one piece of chashu was never going to be enough.
If the broth had been outstanding as I’d initially
thought it’d be, all of the above would have been forgivable. They may perhaps
even be endearing, in the way minor flaws in something perfect remind us that
they’re made by fallible humans. However, the broth had little taste from the
beginning and only got worse from there, faltering in the usual way most ramen
stalls here do, in that the broth loses intensity as the meal progresses. You
know you’re in trouble when your spring onions (and not a very large serving of
spring onions at that) are the most noticeable flavour in your broth. This is
the first broth I’ve had that doesn’t leave an aftertaste of any sort, which
ought to tell you how bad it is.
Value-for-money
Chashu that was barely present, noodles that
were too thin to retain the broth’s taste, a broth that had no taste to begin
with, and to top it all off, a downright paltry serving size to which photos
cannot do justice? I’d think even a person in a coma could write this section.
Come to think of it, the chef probably could too.
Conclusion
I admit that this review has been scathing at
times. Ardent defenders (if they exist) of Tonkotsu Itto may argue that the lighter
(read: non-existent) broth is catered for a different consumer group, one that
can’t stomach the heaviness of normal ramen. I’m calling bollocks on that,
because generally speaking, Tonkotsu broth is meant to be heavy almost by
definition. Needless to say, Tonkotsu Itto can’t begin to hold a candle to
Ikkousha’s sustained excellence, and I fully expect it to be the first stall to
be ousted from this year’s competition.
Have you eaten here before? What was your experience like? We're interested -do share with us in the comments below!
FOODIE’S RATING
| ||
Quality, Taste and Presentation (80%)
|
4.7
| Non-existent taste by ramen standards |
Value (20%)
|
5.0
|
Miserly serving makes it poor value
|
Ambience & others (0%)
|
nil
|
Check Ramen Champion main page on the blog for ambience
|
Total
|
4.8
|
The weak-stomached may appreciate this (highly doubtful)
|
No comments :
Post a Comment